Deployment Scenarios
Sirius deployments focus on solving real delivery constraints across EV charging and mobility sites. The examples below illustrate how modular infrastructure can be deployed to reduce planning risk, improve site performance, and avoid operational complexity.
Remote Fast-Charging Corridor - Amenity Coverage Gap
Status
Site scouted and assessed for feasibility
Location
NSW - Remote (representative)
Site Context
This scenario represents a typical remote fast-charging site identified during Round 4 scoping, where charger deployment is viable but amenity coverage is limited or non-existent.
Typical dwell times at this site exceed 20-40 minutes, creating a mismatch between charging duration and available public amenity.
Typical on-site installation completed within a single day.
Constraints
- No existing public amenities within walking distance
- Regional planning sensitivity
- Limited construction appetite
- Requirement for 24/7 public access
Sirius deployment approach
Sirius delivers and operates the module under a defined scope that does not expand EPC, CPO, or council operational responsibility.
- Amenity Shelter positioned as ancillary infrastructure
- Prefabricated delivery with minimal site works
- No staffing or operational burden for the operator
- Reversible installation to support planning comfort
Outcome (expected)
- Amenity requirement addressed without permanent construction
- Improved assessor confidence and alignment with funding criteria
- Faster site readiness without expanding EPC scope
Applicable Model: Sirius Pod - Amenity Shelter
Tourist Corridor - Seasonal Amenity Demand
Status
Site identified and assessed for feasibility
Location
NSW - Remote (representative)
Site Context
This scenario represents a remote tourist corridor charging site where demand increases significantly during holiday periods, placing pressure on existing amenities and site capacity.
Peak-season dwell times can increase materially during holiday periods, creating temporary demand that existing amenities are not designed to absorb.
Footprint compatible with sub-30 m² infill parcels.
Constraints
- Seasonal spikes in dwell time
- Existing amenities insufficient or closed after hours
- Council preference for non-permanent infrastructure
- Operator unwilling to staff facilities
Sirius deployment approach
Sirius delivers and operates the module under a defined scope that does not expand EPC, CPO, or council operational responsibility.
- Deployment of an Pavilion Enclosed Amenity Module
- Positioned as ancillary, reversible infrastructure
- Autonomous operation without on-site staff
- Installed without permanent foundations
Outcome (expected)
- Improved site usability during peak demand periods
- No long-term operational burden post-season
- Increased council comfort through reversibility
- Enhanced public amenity without overbuilding
Applicable Model: Pavilion - Enclosed Amenity Module
Regional Town Infill - Accessibility / Planning Constraints
Status
Site scouted and evaluated
Location
NSW - Regional (representative)
Site Context
The site is located within an existing town centre or civic precinct where accessibility compliance and footprint constraints restrict traditional construction approaches.
Designed to support 24/7 public access requirements.
Constraints
- Tight spatial envelope
- High accessibility and compliance scrutiny
- Low tolerance for construction disruption
- Need for predictable approval pathways
Sirius deployment approach
Sirius delivers and operates the module under a defined scope that does not expand EPC, CPO, or council operational responsibility.
- Base DDA Restroom Module deployed within defined footprint
- Pre-configured accessibility logic
- Minimal on-site works and fast installation
- Clear removal and reinstatement pathway
Outcome (expected)
- Accessibility requirements addressed
- Reduced planning and delivery risk
- Faster site readiness
- Consistent, repeatable solution for similar sites
Applicable Model: Base - DDA Restroom Module
See how Sirius deploys in constrained environments.
Detailed deployment steps, planning pathways, and responsibility boundaries.
